I’M FUCKING SCREAMING OMGGGGGG THE TIME HAS COME FOR THE 90S TO ROMANTICIZED BY NON-90S KIDS FUCK
I feel like a legend.
The 90s are the new 80s
A libertarian blog, this is a political and philosophical one first. I may post the things I find beautiful or fulfilling. I enjoy art and spiritualism as well, but this blog is primarily about the awakening and enlightenment of the civic thinker. Enjoy!
We went to this burger place for lunch (turned out to be a drag bar which was shitty in other ways) but the walls were papered with rolling stones covers and it just really becomes obvious when you see lots of magazine covers next to each other that men are treated as people and women are treated as objects.
THIS PROVES MY POINT SO HARD IT SMASHES YOU IN THE TEETH
GOSH DARN IT I HOPE YOU FEEL THE SLAP IN YOUR FACE
I mean I get what you are saying and all but remember, they weren’t forced to do that
They act like chicks are the only ones who have posed like that for Rolling Stone Covers.
And that’s just from a quick google search.
Thank you so much for that. I honestly am not against feminism at all but when people start acting like this it makes me a little mad.
A federal judge on Saturday overturned Washington D.C.’s ban on carrying handguns outside the home, saying it was unconstitutional.
"There is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia’s total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny," Judge Frederick Scullin said in an opinion.
"Therefore, the Court finds that the District of Columbia’s complete ban on the carrying of handguns in public is "unconstitutional," he added in his 19-page ruling.
The saddest thing is that most people will find this humorous instead of serious. We’re standing right beside one another, and yet we text others instead of actually speaking to each other. Have you ever sat down and thought about how uncomfortable we now are around one another that it’s so bad that we literally pretend to be texting someone when we’re not, just so it’s less awkward to stand beside people? What’s supposed to strengthen our bonds has taken away from it. It’s time to take our faces out of our phones and notice the world, give a kind gesture to someone, and go SEE your friends instead of just texting them.
I’m going to let that sink in.
Ah yes let me just up and leave school right in between my classes so I can go see the friend 40 miles away that i’m currently texting instead of making idle chit chat with the people around me that I don’t particularly care for.
Fuck your pretentious shit.
"whines evil technology is making people antisocial its not real communication if its not face to face and im a pretentious self righteous shitbaby that asks random people on the street for the time and feels good about it"
Reblogged only for the commentary.
LOL at the OP acting as if the option to pretend to text is what causes the inherent discomfort borne of making smalltalk with random strangers.
We’ve come to expect impossible, even improbable standards of beauty to populate our magazines and our television shows. It’s another thing entirely to find they’ve invaded our workplace.
I just want to know how they categorized “attractiveness” and figured out these statistics. Beauty is almost completely subjective.
Also if this is true, what do they plan to do about it? What’s their solution?
This is true, but the best question is how they plan to legislate it. Would they penalize the attractive or the ones who treat the attractive people better?
There ought to be a law! Redistribute facial features! Or outlaw people who commit the hate crime of thinking others are attractive!
I agree and disagree at the same time. A ring is not the only proof and final testament of love. If a man is faithful, loves you and your children, and provides for you, a ring pales in comparison. Some women have rings but a non-committed spouse. I would LOVE to have a big ring, but I’m not married to the ring. I’m married to the man.
why settle for a house
a whole house
when you can have
I’d much rather have an 8-bedroom house with someone who cares but am not married to than a ring living on the side of the highway. Ijs.
Ok but like why not have both tho?
One’s a piece of jewelry and the other is an investment in real estate?
8 bedrooms sounds kind of ridiculous for two people, though.
When people talk about the ring though, aren’t they talking about marriage? I’d rather get that ring first and sign those papers because he can buy a house, but if you’re name aint on those papers he can kick you out but if you’ve got that ring (aka marriage) you own half his shit. And I dunno, but I’d rather know I own half his shit if we split.
>if you got that ring you own half his shit
>implying we wouldn’t get a prenup before arranging a marriage
>if you got that ring you own half his shit
Fuck, if this is how people view marriage anymore, I’m out.
Some horror films I’m looking forward to!
I’m so excited for these.
No Tusk? Really?
Damn, when did YouTube start removing videos for such a specific violation?